To the Editor:
In response to “Climate change debatable” by John McClaughry in The Citizen Dec. 27, at this point the science is settled and I believe immoral to allude that a debate actually exists – it doesn’t – only how fast and how much.
While Mr. McClaughry seems a fine person with good intentions, he has a poor understanding of the actual science and doesn’t deserve space in the paper on this topic. Those that deny, delay solutions, something that we can no longer afford. The paper needs to do better.
We should pay off the mortgage and leave the kids the house, not use up the house and leave the kids the mortgage.